[back to articles]

Category: Legal & Your Unalienable Rights (112 articles).
Jul 10, 2010   Trueman Tuck speaks out about Bill C-6 Questions and Health Canada and your sovereign legal rights

Clink on the following picture to hear a short (10 excerpt - part 2 below) from the full 46 minute "Power to the People" lecture as a primer to the questions and text below: "Focus entirely on the constitutional and charter violations of C-6. Do NOT mention natural health products in any way, shape or form. If you do, you will likely be dismissed with a reply that C-6 specifically exempts NHPs. This is a bogus response. Schedule 1 of C-6 includes foods, drugs, cosmetics, devices and explosive. Schedule 1 can be revised at any time to include NHPs. Further, the Health Minister has another [full story]
Jul 7, 2010   I Love the Smell of Napalm in the Morning...

I've got a copy of the Doctor's Data v Barrett Federal lawsuit attached to this article. Be careful when you handle it - it's HOT... I was kind of mad at Darryl Hickok, the head of Doctor's Data laboratory a few months ago, for not walking out and legally punching sleazebag Stephen Barrett, and his minions, in the face over their obvious intent to destroy Doctor's Data, and hence, a whole host of great US Doctors, with their activities. [full story]
Jun 28, 2010   Australian courts rule that Vioxx should never have been approved for sale

(NaturalNews) Australian courts recently ruled that Vioxx, a popular prescription painkiller, should never have been approved and allowed on the market. [full story]
Jun 28, 2010   Doctor's Data Laboratory Files Federal Lawsuit Against Barrett, Quackwatch, NCAHF, Consumer Health Digest...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen Friday, June 25th, 2010 Stephen Barrett, who has no income of his own, he claims, had to go to his wife Judith the other day, I think, and say "Honey, I need an increase in my allowance this month. I'm getting sued in Fed Court in Chicago now, and I'm going to need $250,000 this month as a retainer, and another $100,000 per month to pay for my Defense, for the next year, or so." On Friday June 18th, 2010 Doctor's Data Laboratory filed an eleven count lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Stephen [full story]
Apr 13, 2010   Contradictory rulings suggest law is due for an overhaul

Bans on hate speech in human rights law are often justified in part because they can be overturned by fully fledged courts of law, where the rules are more strict. [full story]
Mar 1, 2010   Free speech victory in Whatcott v. Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal

CALGARY: The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) today responded to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision in Whatcott v. Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal, a case in which the CCF had intervened in support of free expression. [full story]
Feb 14, 2010   This man didn't have either

Freeman, An Affidavit Of Truth... And a Video Camera "...these teachings are not called 'secret' because it is forbidden to talk about them. They are 'secret' because so few who hear them understand." - excerpt from Mary Croft's Book: "HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN" [full story]
Oct 30, 2009   Senate Mccoy requested to intervene and ensure that the Bill C-6 witnesses do not continue to be rigged

Dear Senator Elaine McCoy,   A very disturbing Edmonton Journal article published in today's paper, follows below. As Council Member of Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom, I wish to reiterate the following:   There appears to be a deliberate movement within the Senate Committee to ensure that the Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom does not get an opportunity to provide witness testimony in opposition to Bill C-6. That is not acceptable in a democratic society. We are one of the more knowledgeable groups in the country. I ask that you contact every member of the Senate Committee, [full story]
Aug 2, 2009   Why was property rights left out of the Charter, but included in the Canadian Bill of Rights?

PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION INTRODUCTION As part of the constitutional package announced in September 1991, the federal government proposed that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms be amended to guarantee property rights. This paper provides background information as to why these rights were not earlier included in the Charter. The paper also addresses what is meant by the term "property rights" and the question of how the courts might interpret the term "property" for purposes of the relevant provision if it were included in the Charter. Finally, the paper canvasses possible [full story]
Jul 28, 2009   Understanding Canada's Implied Bill of Rights & Written and Unwritten Constitution and how to use it to protect yourself

In order to succeed on a motion to strike out under Rule 221(b) or (d) it is for Canada Post to show that the pleading in the Counterclaim is so clearly immaterial, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious so as to be obviously forlorn and futile: see Burnaby Machine & Mill Equipment Ltd. v Berglund Industrial Supply Ltd. (1982), 64 C.P.R. (2d) 206 at 210 (F.C.T.D.). I do not take the "obviously forlorn and futile" test as setting a different standard from Hunt, Operation Dismantle or Inuit Tapirisat, referred to in the first footnote. Indeed, in Burnaby Machine & Mill, Mr. Justice Dubé refers [full story]
Jul 19, 2009   Supreme court quashes drug conviction over illegal search

Supreme court quashes drug conviction over illegal search Last Updated: Friday, July 17, 2009 | 3:52 PM ET Comments1036Recommend222 CBC News A woman walks past the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa. (Tom Hanson/Canadian Press) Canada's top court tossed out a drug conviction linked to the seizure of 35 kilograms of cocaine Friday, saying evidence obtained with "willful and flagrant" disregard for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can't be used in trial. The ruling was one of four handed down by the Supreme Court aimed at clarifying [full story]
May 24, 2009   Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

UN Declaration of Human Rights       On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act, the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories." Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of [full story]
May 24, 2009   s outlined by the majority the proper function of the implied bill of rights after the adoption of the Charter is to 'fill in the gaps' in the express terms of the constitutional texts.

Implied Bill of Rights is a judicial theory in Canadian jurisprudence that recognizes that certain basic principles are underlying the Constitution of Canada. Invoked more often before the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted it is nonetheless important when questions of parliamentary supremacy and the override power come into play. It played a part in the reasons given in the Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217. The concept of an implied bill of rights develops out of Canadian federalism. When provincial legislation intrudes deeply into [full story]
May 24, 2009   Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice.

Monday, December 05, 2005 Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice. Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights. "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," said a prepared text of the lecture Chief Justice McLachlin [full story]
May 24, 2009   Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice.

Monday, December 05, 2005   Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice. Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights. "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," said a prepared text of the lecture Chief Justice McLachlin gave [full story]
May 24, 2009   Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right to travel upon the public roads by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive his Right and convert that Right into a privilege.

Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right to travel upon the public roads by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive his Right and convert that Right into a privilege. Furthermore, it was long since established that this "privilege" has been defined as applying only to those who are "conducting business in the streets" or "operating for-hire vehicles." The legislature has attempted (by legislative fiat) to deprive the Citizen of his Right to use the roads in the ordinary course of life and business, without affording [full story]
Apr 5, 2009   The person authorizing the other to act is the principal, granter or donor (of the power), and the one authorized to act is the agent, the attorney-in-fact[1], or in many Common Law jurisdictions, simply the attorney.

A power of attorney (POA) or letter of attorney in common law systems or mandate in civil law systems is an authorization to act on someone else's behalf in a legal or business matter. The person authorizing the other to act is the principal, granter or donor (of the power), and the one authorized to act is the agent, the attorney-in-fact[1], or in many Common Law jurisdictions, simply the attorney. Contents [full story]
Apr 5, 2009   An attorney in fact is an individual who has been granted authority by way of a power of attorney to act on behalf of another person.

There are a number of cases in which the designation of an attorney in fact can be helpful. An attorney in fact is an individual who has been granted authority by way of a power of attorney to act on behalf of another person. In some cases, this authority is granted for a specified period of time, while in other instance, the individual may function as the attorney in fact until the privilege is revoked. Here is some examples of what functioning as an attorney in fact may entail, as well as a few scenarios in which designating an attorney in fact may be in the bests interests of the individual. [full story]
Mar 24, 2009   Trueman Tuck along with a delegation of Health Freedom Fighters will meet in Ottawa in an attempt to put to end Bills C-51, C-52 and the now Bill C-6 and Bill C-10 as well as the Drug Class Natural Health Products Regulations that have been strangling ..

We need our hopes and prayers behind the Ottawa meetings this March 30 and March 31. Trueman Tuck along with a delegation of Health Freedom Fighters will meet in Ottawa in an attempt to put to end Bills C-51, C-52 and the now Bill C-6 and Bill C-10 as well as the Drug Class Natural Health Products Regulations that have been strangling the Natural Health Products Industry. A Bit About Trueman Tuck: Trueman Tuck who's office resides in Belleville Ontario is an upright walking, friend, advocate and defender of people, families and their small to medium business enterprises. Fighting [full story]
Mar 19, 2009   The issue of a 'People's Mandate' relates to advancing the position that the People are Sovereign over the Parliament.

The People's Mandate   The issue of a 'People's Mandate' relates to advancing the position that the People are Sovereign over the Parliament. The government of the day is the servant of the Sovereign People who create it. A petition by the People to the government is but a plea, and carries no weight other than to inform the government of the views of a group of people. A 'People's Mandate' is quite different in that it is a direct order or instruction from the Sovereign People to their servants, the government, to do or not to do a specific thing. A government [full story]
Feb 10, 2009   "Man is free at the moment he wishes to be." - Voltaire

How To Become A Sovereign Individual -- "Man is free at the moment he wishes to be." - Voltaire   You can create your own personal sovereignty. You can own your own life. It will not be utopia or without challenges, but you can start re-defining yourself today. Many are uncomfortable with personal choice and prefer others lead them -- personal choice does require personal responsibility. Even more are uncomfortable with others having personal choice -- and want to dictate their lives. If you desire liberty for yourself and others, first discover how it is being achieved today. There are people [full story]
Jan 15, 2009   If you are not FREE, you are a SLAVE.

Dear Fellow Australians, NO KANGAROO COURTS! WEAR A I GREEN RIBBON FOR JUSTICE!   It's spot-on in the Bible where it says that "in the place of judgment wickedness was there and in the place of justice iniquity was there"....because that's what we have today. The definition of a Court is "a place where Justice is administered" ....and the definition of Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". The definition of a Kangaroo Court is "a court that acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal rights or disregards legal procedures.   ALL AUSTRALIAN COURTS [full story]
Nov 12, 2008   Thanks for the email ....but I am not important.....the Right to Trial by Jury is the sole focus. There is no surrendering of this essential Right..and that applies everywhere in the world.

Dear Gerry, Thanks for the email ....but I am not important.....the Right to Trial by Jury is the sole focus. There is no surrendering of this essential Right..and that applies everywhere in the world. The media has to be targeted. Our enemies know the strategic importance of the media....and so must we. Illegal foreclosures are the greatest wrong being inflicted on ordinary People.......and all it takes to put that right is for the media to start telling the People why those foreclosures are illegal....which is the absence of Trial by Jury, i.e.: "no free man shall be dispossessed [full story]
Nov 12, 2008   If you have a birth certificate, or SSN/SIN, or a citizen"ship" number, you are the owner of a stock certificate - but not it's managing holder. Guess who is holding it and managing your share?

Rob Menard's new "security of the person" video is online: CLICK HERE: Did you know you own a share of not just the national debt, but also of the national wealth? If you have a birth certificate, or SSN/SIN, or a citizen"ship" number, you are the owner of a stock certificate - but not it's managing holder. Guess who is holding it and managing your share? Due to Canada's great wealth in natural resources, it is individually worth up to an estimated $400,000 a year, paid to the individual in quarterly dividend payments. [full story]
Nov 6, 2008   Trial by Jury is Democracy....and denying Trial by Jury is TREASON.

Dear Fellow Australians, I had a phone call yesterday from the "Associate" to "Justice" Hislop of the NSW Supreme Court, to say that the "Judge" would be handing down his "Judgment" to a Notice of motion from the Crown Solicitor representing the State of New South Wales in an action brought by me by way of a Summons for Unlawful Arrest of me because the "Reasons for Arrest" in the Arrest Warrant were not true, ie: it said I did not attend the Burwood Local Court on 30 July 2008 ...whereas, in fact, I have the Court Transcript as proof that I was there. To read the Court Transcript of my [full story]
Oct 29, 2008   He said the public was justifiably outraged when people who committed the worst crimes were given soft sentences, or no jail at all.

Dear Col, Trial by Jury is Democracy. Subverting and/or extirpating the Right to Trial by Jury is TREASON. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: Col To: John Wilson Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:17 AM Subject: Scrapping juries .................the wedge! G'day John, deja vu ?? Regards Col www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24564386-2862,00.html?referrer=email Scrap some juries to speed justice - DPP Jeremy Rapke Article from: Geoff Wilkinson October 28, 2008 12:20pm REMOVING juries in some criminal [full story]
Oct 23, 2008   Universal Declaration of Human Rights Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories." PREAMBLE Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights [full story]
Oct 19, 2008   TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY ....which means that People have Sovereignty and they exercise that ultimate authority to make and impose laws by way of the unanimous Judgments of twelve free and equal men

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters, WORLD PEACE means Peace between Nations and Peace within Nations. TRIAL BY JURY means Justice, Equality, Freedom, and the Rule of Law. I urge everyone to go and see the Magna Carta Monument in Canberra and to read the great works on Trial by Jury. TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY ....which means that People have Sovereignty and they exercise that ultimate authority to make and impose laws by way of the unanimous Judgments of twelve free and equal men who ask "SO HELP ME GOD" in order for them to administer Justice. [full story]
Oct 10, 2008   Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body

Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.". And Sir William Blackstone wrote: "UPON these accounts the trial by jury even has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English [full story]
Sep 20, 2008   It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”.

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION OR THE RULES OF THE GAME It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William [full story]
Sep 20, 2008   All law, in fact, hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself (Matthew 22: 35 – 40).

MORE EVIL THAN TREASON: Dear Friends in Liberty, “And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage),” (Galatians 2:4) If we are to be free, we must apply the Rule of Law which is “1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   King Alfred the Great (849, ruled 871-899) was one of the best kings ever to rule mankind. He defended Anglo-Saxon England from Viking raids, formulated a code of laws, and fostered a rebirth of religious and scholarly activity [Charter / Constutition]

KING ALFRED THE GREAT King Alfred the Great (849, ruled 871-899) was one of the best kings ever to rule mankind. He defended Anglo-Saxon England from Viking raids, formulated a code of laws, and fostered a rebirth of religious and scholarly activity. His reign exhibits military skill and innovation, sound governance and the ability to inspire men and plan for the future, piety and a practical commitment to the support of religion, personal scholarship and the promotion of education. "Desire for and possession of earthly power never pleased me overmuch, and I did not unduly desire this earthly [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   THE CHARTER of LIBERTIES (1100.) is important as Henry 1 formally bound himself to the laws, further establishing King Alfred's " GOD'S JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW" most important principle - "THERE IS NOT SUPREMACY / DIVINE RIGHT

The CHARTER of LIBERTIES of HENRY I (1100.) This charter, granted by Henry when he ascended the throne, is important in two ways. First, Henry formally bound himself to the laws, setting the stage for the rule of law that parliaments and parliamentarians of later ages would cry for. Second, it reads almost exactly like the Magna Carta, and served as the model for the Great Charter in 1215. [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   International Covenant [CHARTER] on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assemblyresolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27 status of ratifications declarations and reservations Preamble The States Parties to the present Covenant, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Canadian Charter [Covenant/Declaration] of Rights and Freedoms 1982

Schedule B Constitution Act, 1982 Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982 PART I Canadian charter of rights and freedoms Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law: Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Fundamental Freedoms [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Herbalists Charter [Covenant / Declaration] of Henry the VIII

Herbalists Charter of Henry the VIII Annis Tricesimo Quarto and Tricesimo Quinto. Henry VIII Regis. Cap. VIII. An Act That Persons, Being No Common Surgeons, May Administer Outward Medicines Were in the Parliament holden at Westminster in the third Year of the King's most gracious reign, amongst other things, for the avoiding of Sorceries, Witchcrafts, and other Inconveniences, it was enacted, that no Person within the City of London, nor within Seven Miles of the same, should take upon him to exercise and occupy as Physician or Surgeon, except he be first examined, approved, and admitted [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   INTERNATIONAL DECLARATION [CHARTER / COVENANT] OF HEALTH FREEDOM 2006

World Health Freedom Assembly 2006 St. Paul, Minnesota ***Held at the William Mitchell College of Law*** On September 29th and 30th, 2006, a World Health Freedom Assembly met in St. Paul, Minnesota and adopted and proclaimed an International Declaration of Health Freedom, the full text of which appears below. Following this historic act the assembly called upon all members of the human family, organizations, and countries present, and those others that wish to support this statement, to publicize the text of the Declaration and “to cause it to be honored, implemented, disseminated, displayed, [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.”44 [Charter / Declaration / Covenannt]

The Covenants of the gods The contractual nature of governments of the world From the book The Covenants of the godsLaw (The legal system of God) vs. Legal (The lawful system of man) To investigate is the way to know what things are really lawful.43 “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.”44 In the above statement the Supreme court talks of “what only appears to be law” “on the surface.” What are we so ignorant of, that we would [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   For over two centuries, millions of Americans based upon the finest Judeo-Christian Charter / Constutition / Covenant / Declaration in the World have prayed to GOD. That has make the USA PEOPLE OWNED AND OPERATED REPUBLIC since 1776 a strong nation.

President Bush: "It's the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God"Remarks of President Bush on National Day of Prayer - May 3, 2007 WASHINGTON, May 3, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Today Americans are celebrating National Day of Prayer. Demonstrations before the Supreme Court will include William "Bill" Murray, whose famous mother, Madelyn Murray O'Hare, used her son to legally end voluntary prayer in public schools in 1963. Today however, Murray heads the Religious Freedom Coalition and will join in the National Day of Prayer service on the High Court's [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Charter / Constutition/Covenant and Majority Rule - For then the law of majority vote is itself a sort of fundamental law. And thus it is not the will of the people but the will of each party and every individual that is sovereign.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Popular Sovereignty as Pitfall As some of you are aware of, I am working on (in fact, nearing completion of: word count is now approaching 100,000) the constitutional law volume of Stahl's Philosophy of Law. Just this morning I translated a section which, at first glance, seems "over the top" in terms of its utter rejection of the concept of popular sovereignty. But the more I think about it, in the light of my earlier posts regarding the machinery of manipulation, the more I can see the truth in what Stahl is arguing. And that truth is this: that popular sovereignty [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   GOD'S JUDEO-CHRISTIAN LAWS are the basis of all fair and just TRUE RULE OF LAW legal foundations for a valued and principled REPUBLIC such as was attempted to be established in the USA Declaration / Charter / Covenant / Constutition of 1776

LAWS OF GOD: CODIFIED A Document to re-establish the long forgotten Theocratic Laws and rules that pertain to the Universe, to the People of the planet Earth and, in particular, the People of Australia and its possessions. Whereas Australia was founded, established and civilized by people of the Christian faith based upon the Word of God as described in the Holy Bible; And whereas through neglect, disregard and abuse of the blessings allotted to Australia and its possessions by pagan-minded leadership and a culpable population, the Christian faith of the land has been obfuscated and [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Charters/Covenants/ Constutition. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is n

This is profound. Thought you'd like it. Did God create everything that exists? Does evil exist? Did God create evil? The University professor challenged his students with this question. "Did God create everything that exists?" A student bravely replied, "Yes he did!" "God created everything?" The professor asked. "Yes sir", the student replied. The professor answered, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principal that our works define who we are, then God is evil." The student became quiet before such an answer. The professor, [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Understanding the legal foundations of the Judeo-Christian Charter / Covenant/ Constutition/Declarations - the Canadian Implied Bill of Rights

Canadian Implied Bill of Rights From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Implied Bill of Rights is a judicial theory in Canadian jurisprudence that recognizes that certain basic principles are underlying the Constitution of Canada. Invoked more often before the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted it is nonetheless important when questions of parliamentary supremacy and the override power come into play. It played a part in the reasons given in the Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217. The concept of an implied bill of rights develops [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   The History of the Common Law [GOD's JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW AND THE UNALIENABLE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS - THE PROCALMATIONS / CHARTERS / DECLARATIONS / WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN CONSTUTITIONS / ETC. ] of England by Matthew Hale 1713

The History of the Common Law [GOD's JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW AND THE UNALIENABLE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS - THE PROCALMATIONS / CHARTERS / DECLARATIONS / WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN CONSTUTITIONS / ETC. ] of Englandby Matthew Hale1713 I. Concerning the Distribution of the Law of England into Common Law, and Statute Law. And First, concerning the Statute Law, or Acts of Parliament The Laws of England may aptly enough be divided into two Kinds, viz. Lex Scripta, the written Law: and Lex non Scripta, the unwritten Law: For although (as shall be shewn hereafter) all the Laws of this Kingdom have some [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   On Our God-given Charter Judeo-Christian Rights / Freedooms & Liberties / Covenants / Constutitions / by Patrick Henry 1775

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:22 AM Subject: WE ARE NOT SUBJECT Patrick Henry March 23, 1775 All men and women are created with equal rights. These rights are such that we all may exercise them simultaneously without interfering with or infringing upon the rights of another. This is freedom.Government -- ALL government -- has intentionally become destructive to our freedom and liberty. Instead of securing and protecting the natural rights of man, as government is designed to do, in every nation of this world it has sought to usurp its people and to reduce them under complete despotism. [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   To understand your Charter / Constitutional / Covenant / Declarations in Canada see e-archive index below

Tuck's Professional Services Reference Centre Constitutional Acts 1763-2001 Brought to you by TrueMan of the Tuck family, a Soverign Being / Child of God see www.truemantuck.ca and / or www.tucksprofessionalservices and / or www.friendsoffreedominternational.org [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   The Constitution of the United States 1787 [Charter / Covenant / Declarations]

The Constitution of the United States 1787 We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," [Charter / Constutition / Covenant / Declaration/ God's Judeo-Christian Laws]

McLachlin urges judges to go beyond letter of law Courts should defy legislation to protect rights, chief justice says Janice Tibbetts The Ottawa Citizen Monday, December 05, 2005 Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice. Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights. "The rule of law requires [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   God's Judeo-Christian Rule of Law - Our most important legal foundation in regards to Charters, Covenants, Constutitions, Declarations and Common Law

The Canadian Rule of Law and the Courts Responsible government and federalism [TRUEMAN'S COMMENTS - THIS IS ONE OF "THEIR" LIES/FRAUDS - CANADA IS NOT A FEDERAL NATION - IT IS A CONFEDERATED CORPORATE COLONY OF THE ELITES AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN SINCE THE CONQUEST IN 1759] are two cornerstones of our system of government. There is a third, without which neither of the first two would be safe: the rule of law. What does the rule of law mean? It means that everyone is subject to the law; that no one, no matter how important or powerful, is above the law — not the government; not the Prime Minister, [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   ... the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions; [Charter / Constutition / Covenant/ Declarat

Canadian Bill of Rights 1960, c. An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [Assented to 10th August 1960] Preamble The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions; Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law; And being desirous of enshrining [full story]
Sep 1, 2008   Values most commonly assigned to the Judeo-Christian tradition are Liberty and Equality based on Genesis, where all humans are created equal, and Exodus, where the Israelites flee tyranny to freedom [Charters / Covenants / Constutitions / Declarations]

Judeo-Christian (or Judaeo-Christian, sometimes written as Judæo-Christian) is a term used to describe the body of concepts and values which are thought to be held in common by Judaism and adapted by Christianity, and considered, often along with classical Greco-Roman civilization, a fundamental basis for Western legal codes and moral values. In particular, the term refers to the common Old Testament/Tanakh as a basis of both moral traditions, including particularly the Ten Commandments; and implies a common set of values present in the modern Western World. The values most commonly assigned to [full story]
Aug 29, 2008   AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES.

ATTENTION: POLICE AND SHERIFFS. DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE USED TO DESTROY TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY? THAT’S WHAT THE BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE YOU DOING. ********************** AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES. [full story]
Aug 27, 2008   Well you can’t get on with anything because I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court. All proceedings cease.

ACCUSED: NO I’m here to challenge the jurisdiction of the court. I have it in written form and I’d like the stamp by the court and the court keep one copy and one copy to the opposition and I’ll keep the other two. HIS HONOUR: All right so just before we get onto that Mr Wilson – ACCUSED: Well you can’t get on with anything because I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court. All proceedings cease. There is a peremptory stay of proceedings until the jurisdiction is determined by a special jury. That is the law. [full story]
Aug 18, 2008   In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary.

J.A.I.L. (Juries Against Illegal Laws) As you are aware, 5 men are committing suicide each day in Australia due to the results of State and Federal legislation dealing with Family Law. In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary. Did you know, that last year in Victoria alone, that there were approximately 600 suicides by children. Most of these suicides are directly related to family break-ups. (source ABS) If you were to add [full story]
Aug 18, 2008   "Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty" (anon) ... "our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:4).

Dear Fellow Australians, The Juror's Oath ends with, "So help me God", in order to bind their conscience when judging the law and the facts. Trial by Jury is asking for the help of God when twelve jurors, who are our equals, congregate to administer Justice. We are Freemen and we have the Right to Trial by Jury. "Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty" (anon) ... "our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:4). Courts are places where Justice is administered ... and Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". [full story]
Jul 23, 2008   Our Courts are no longer "places where Justice is administered" but are dens of thieves and traitors.

The Hon. John Hatzistergos, Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Parramatta Justice Precinct, 160 Marsden Street, Parramatta, NSW 2124. Dear John, Re: Our Courts. Please find below the transcripts of 26 June, 2008 in the NSW Supreme Court. Our Courts are no longer "places where Justice is administered" but are dens of thieves and traitors. I would like an appointment to come and talk about the wickedness that is now there. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks, [full story]
Jul 23, 2008   For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to 'public office' as 'Judge', 'Clerk of Court', etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their b

Wednesday, April 9, 2008 Their Bonds are their buns! DUN & BRADSTREET: 'Rating Service' for all corporate entities'_Void for legal cause fraud _ "Brutum Fulmen"? by "S"TE ENTITIES'_Void for legal cause fraudThere are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service:D-B is a financial rating service for both 'public' and 'private' corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B perview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis, [full story]
Jul 23, 2008   Of course, the "strawman/legal fiction" business is only a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court, re: Relationship, from the point of view that these are entities created by the third level of jurisdiction, ie

Dear Fellow Australians, Yesterday, at the Hornsby Local Court, I had little fling with the "strawman/legal fiction" gimmick with the "Magistrate", a grumpy 60-year old man name of Brennan...or is that BRENNAN?. He ignored the whole business and adjourned the matter to September 1. I asked him, "Are you listening to what I'm saying?" He answered, "No.", and ordered the Sheriffs' Officers to remove me from the Courtroom. There were about 70 other Defendants in the Courtroom. I managed to quickly advise everyone that they must find out about their Rights and told them that Australian [full story]
Jul 16, 2008   The following information should be taken very seriously. Many churches are coming out of the revised Roman system by relinguishing their 501 (c)(3) status. Where does your Church assembly stand in this matter?

Are you serving more than one Master? The following information should be taken very seriously. Many churches are coming out of the revised Roman system by relinguishing their 501 (c)(3) status. Where does your Church assembly stand in this matter? The 501(c)(3) Tax Exemption Taking a License to Preach Is your church "government licensed and approved"? The incorporation of the local Christian assembly and application for the 501(c)(3) tax exemption is indeed the proof of such apostasy. The Ecclesia vs the Corporation ecclesia L. ecclesia, Gr. ekklesia 1577, ek-klay-see'-ah; from [full story]
Jul 16, 2008   The Right to Trial by Jury is pivotal to whether we have Democracy or Tyranny. If we have it, we have Democracy and we can avail ourselves of all our other Rights.

Dear Fellow Australians, The Right to Trial by Jury is pivotal to whether we have Democracy or Tyranny. If we have it, we have Democracy and we can avail ourselves of all our other Rights. If we don't, then we can't and we are at the disposal of dictators and tyrants and will suffer all the injustices they chose to impose on us. As is the practice of lawyers, history and truth, itself, are distorted and manipulated to our disadvantage. Here follows a brief item to compare what used to be and what is now. Before Trial by Jury, the strong ruled. Now, with Trial by Jury, we all [full story]
Jun 22, 2008   It means that everyone is subject to the law; that no one, no matter how important or powerful, is above the law — not the government; not the Prime Minister, or any other Minister; not the Queen or the Governor General or any Lieutenant-Governor; not the

How Canadians Govern Themselves, 6th Edition - The Rule of Law and the Courts 1 Page 1 of I Table of contents PDF Version) Print this Section ) The Rule of Law and the Courts Responsible government and federalism are two cornerstones of our system of government. There is a third, without which neither of the first two would be safe: the rule of law. What does the rule of law mean? It means that everyone is subject to the law; that no one, no matter [full story]
Jun 22, 2008   In Canada the Rule of Law is equated with the Supremacy of God, per the preamble to its Constitution Act of 1982

Rule of law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page I of 4 Rule of law From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Politics series: n Politics by country n Political science n Political history · Political scientists n Comparative government a International relations · Political economy n Political philosophy · Political psychology n Form of government n Sovereignty · Public administration a Consent of the governed a [full story]
Jun 22, 2008   the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s perso

Dear Gary, I don't know what President George W. Bush is sprouting about "the rule of law", but here is what it really is: RULE OF LAW: 1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s personal freedoms are formulated and protected [full story]
Jun 14, 2008   But yesterday the High Court struck back with a judgment that confirms there are limitations on the right of the police to stay on premises after the occupier has told them to leave.

Tip from down under Greetings All, A wee snippet for your perusal. Col. CRIKEY (crikey.com)13 June 2008 9 . High Court rules on the right to ask police to leave your premises Greg Barns writes: Civil liberties have taken a beating in Australia in recent years with governments of all hues consistently legislating to strengthen police powers. But yesterday the High Court struck back with a judgment that confirms there are limitations on the right of the police to stay on premises after the occupier has told them to leave. In a 4-1 judgement, Chief Justice Murray Gleeson [full story]
Mar 4, 2008   The Telegraaf newspaper reported that the coalition government was divided on the film, with the Christian Democrats leaning towards a ban but Labour favouring freedom of expression and calling on Muslim countries to prevent violence against the Netherlan

Dutch government may ban Wilders' Qur'an film DhimmiWatch.com 3-3-8 Dhimmitude and fear. "Dutch government could ban anti-Islam film," from the Guardian (thanks to all who sent this in): The Dutch government was today examining the legality of banning a film attacking Islam amid fears that it would fan sentiment against the Netherlands in Muslim countries. The Telegraaf newspaper reported that the coalition government was divided on the film, with the Christian Democrats leaning towards a ban but Labour favouring freedom of expression and calling on Muslim countries to prevent violence [full story]
Jan 30, 2008   Act to establish Trials by Jury

First Parliament. In the 32nd Year of George III. A.D. 1792 CHAP. II.An Act to establish TRIALS by JURY Whereas, the Trial by Jury has been long established and approved in our Mother Country, and is one of the chief benefits to be attained by a freee Constitution ; Be it therefore enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Assembly of the Province of Upper Canada, constituted and assembled by virtue of and under the authority of an Act passed in the Parliament of Great Britain, intitled, "An Act to repeal certain [full story]
Jan 2, 2008   As Members, we know that the authentic Trial by Jury is the only effective (peaceful) remedy known to mankind by which a barrier to state tyranny and the injustices perpetrated by prejudiced or incompetent judges are nullified and annihilated.

Dear Kenn, Joanna and Astra, Another very good article and a "must read" for all. However, I must pick you up on the constant wrongful use of the word, "government". Attached is a CLRG leaflet which explains what I mean. Every form of the media and in every school, we are subjected to the repetition of the fraud that Parliament (Executive and advisory Houses, thereof) are the "Government". Joseph Goebbels (Hitler's Minister for Propaganda) said the People will accpet a lie, if the lie is big enough and repeated loudly and often. I look forward to your next circular ...with [full story]
Dec 27, 2007   Sue Maynes FLORA Farmers land Ownership Rights in Australia

----- Original Message ----- From: Sue Maynes To: John Wilson Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 8:46 AM Subject: Speaking Hi John - just to let you and your readers know. I will be speaking at the Humanist Society Open Forum meeting - Wednesday January 9 at 8pm. The address is Humanist House, 10 Shepherd St, Chippendale 2005 (opp Broadway Shopping Centre). Topic is "Do you own your own land & can government remove your ownership?" I will be discussing the issue of the QLD Constitution 2001 and governments' Eminent Domain claim over our private land, as well as our rights. I [full story]
Dec 9, 2007   “Common Law doth control Acts of Parliament and adjudges them when against common right to be void”

GOING TO COURT: “Where’s the Jury? I have the Democratic Right to Trial by Jury. It takes the congregation of 12 of my equals to form an Executive of Common Law to judge me. You are only a Public Servant, a creation of Bureaucracy, with no Jurisdiction over me, at all. I do not consent for the whole or any part of this action to be hear and tried without a Jury - therefore, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.” **************** Democracy is the Rule of Common Law. Bureaucracy is the Rule of Statute Law. Common [full story]
Nov 30, 2007   The Bill of Rights 1688 says that

Dear Debra, The Bill of Rights 1688 says that "evil counsellors, judges and ministers did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the realm". Nothing has changed. We still have these evil creatures conducting their campaign of lies and treachery. Judges don't make any laws, at all. Democracy is the Rule of Common Law which is made by the People by way of the unanimous Judgments of Juries....hence the name "Common" which means "of the People, by the People and for the People. Authors of such lies as you have below ought to be imprisoned for Treason. Yours [full story]
Nov 25, 2007   The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement

Dear Gerrit, The U.S. Constitution was never approved by a Referendum....was it? Therefore, the U.S. Constitution is only a Statute, ie: an Act of Parliament, amended by Parliament, and cannot be construed to be the Law of the Land. The Land is greater than any Parliament....is it not? The Land I would equate with the People. A Parliament is only Bureaucracy....and Bureaucracy is inferior to Democracy....ie: People Rule is superior Jurisdiction to whatever Parliament Rules. At least the Australian Constitution was adopted by a majority of voters in a majority of States [full story]
Nov 21, 2007   Democracy is the Rule of Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People and is made by the unanimous Judgments of the congregations of 12 Freemen

COURTS ARE GOVERNMENT Government is the system of governing – and to govern is to rule with authority. Governance by the People is Democracy. Governance by Judges and Magistrates is Bureaucracy. Who has power in the Courts is the Government over the Land and the People. Democracy is the Rule of Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People and is made by the unanimous Judgments of the congregations of 12 Freemen as Jurors, who ask “So help me, God” for them to administer Justice. Justice is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”. Bureaucracy [full story]
Nov 18, 2007   Trial by jury is more than just an instrument of justice... it is the lamp that shows that freedom lives.

"Each jury is a little parliament... The first object of any tyrant... would be to make parliament utterly subservient to his will; and the next to overthrow or diminish trial by jury, for no tyrant could afford to leave a subject’s freedom in the hands of twelve of his countrymen... [T]rial by jury is more than just an instrument of justice... it is the lamp that shows that freedom lives." Sir Patrick Devlin Trial by jury (1971) 164. [full story]
Nov 16, 2007   Congress can't pass a law that changes or erases any part of the constitution!

----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Lancaster To: Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam ; Fred Bader ; Chuck Brucks ; cmarcu34668@peoplepc.com ; E.Crockett ; The "Exposé" ; Sorcha Faal ; Trinity Farms ; fascist_bush_004 ; Jeff Fisher ; Fresno Bee ; Godsmystery ; Idaho Observer ; Andy McCracken ; Merced Sun Star ; Judith Nipps ; Onion Newspaper ; Oregonian ; Stan Park ; Pay_the_Piper ; John Perna ; VirginiaF. Raines ; rcwcodebuster@comcast.net ; rich ; ricniemela ; Ron Paul 2008Ron Paul ; ronaldneil@sbcglobal.net ; RonPaulLiberty ; Cal Steinberger ; Stephen ; stu8340@comcast.net ; Sumerian.. ; Telegraph [full story]
Nov 8, 2007   "So what's the difference when you don't have Trial by Jury?"

"Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org> wrote: From: "Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org>To: "Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org>Subject: Justice vs Mammon. From Kenn d'Oudney.Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:26:03 +0100 BODY { MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; COLOR: #0033cc; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica } This is for your interest.Can you help alert the people? Kenn. www.democracydefined.org/The Home Page of The Democracy Defined Campaignfor RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL [full story]
Nov 8, 2007   Now an ORDER is a JUDGEMENT. These men are jailed, JUDGED to be guilty without a shred of evidence being presented and without the right to defend themselves in any way.

Dear Olga, There is a recent movie on the American journalist and commentator, Ed Murrow, in which he said the same thing as you, ie: "We cannot fight for Liberty overseas while we lose it here, at home". Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olga Scully" <liz@intas.net.au> To: <liz@intas.net.au> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:20 PM Subject: [Fwd: AVO's - Presumption of Guilt and No Redress] On November 7, 2007, I attended Court at St Helens, Tasmania.Mr Ray Escobar had been summoned by Tasmania Police to answer a charge of disobeying [full story]
Nov 6, 2007   Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right

----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Bauer Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:45 AM Subject: Driver's License Challenge of Not Meeting Goals "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsel or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams INTRODUCTION Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the [full story]
Oct 16, 2007   The fact of the matter is that ALL humans have many inalienable "natural" and/or "universal/divine" law human rights.

Dear Jim, Extremely well put. Now, let's all go to Court and demand what is ours. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim To: John Wilson ; c m Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:26 PM Subject: Re: The Internet Under Attack from Bureaucratic Terrorists Hi John and Colleen, I don't know if Colleen was being sarcastic when she wrote, "As you and everyone else knows we have NO RIGHTS AND WE HAVE TO DO AS WE ARE TOLD... and... Australian Slave with NO Rights and Corporate Merchandise," but I would like to comment on this. The fact of [full story]
Oct 16, 2007   “No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land” (Magna Carta 1215).

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IS FRAUD: FRAUDULENT LOAN CONTRACTS: Under COMMON LAW, there are 8 essential elements for the creation of a contract, ie: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) sufficient consideration; (4) intention to enter legal relations; (5) capacity to contract; (6) legality of purpose; (7) genuine consent; and (8) certainty of terms. VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for uncertainty. To make out that an illegal contract is valid is fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing. FRAUDULENT DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: “No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the [full story]
Oct 14, 2007   under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William Blackstone wrote) has alw

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION OR THE RULES OF THE GAME It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William [full story]
Oct 3, 2007   “The difference between the Common Law and the Admiralty/Maritime or Commercial Law is that the Common law is the LAW OF THE LAND, it’s the PEOPLE’S LAW and it is exercised by ‘WE THE PEOPLE’.

----- Original Message ----- From: astrojet2 To: John Wilson Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:00 PM Subject: TRIAL BY JURY OF PEERS “The difference between the Common Law and the Admiralty/Maritime or Commercial Law is that the Common law is the LAW OF THE LAND, it’s the PEOPLE’S LAW and it is exercised by ‘WE THE PEOPLE’. The ADMIRALTY/MARTIME Commercial Venue, STATUTORY PROVISIONS are NOT Common law, they’re ‘CORPORATE ADMINSTRATIVE COMMERCIAL LAW’ and they’re UNDER the purview of the BAR association. ALL of that is CONTRACT LAW and the BAR association was given the PURVIEW OVER CONTRACTS [full story]
Oct 1, 2007   For megalomaniacs to take over the world, they must first dispose of these icons which have indelibly confirmed the Order and the Rule of Law according to the Christian perspective.

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION OR THE RULES OF THE GAME It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William [full story]
Sep 29, 2007   If you're immigrating to this country and you don't like the rules that are in place then you have the right to choose not to live here.

Lost and expound By MICHAEL COREN Sun Media 9-30-7 There was a time when the West was thought to be synonymous with freedom and liberty. Mind you, there was a time when Canada was thought to be synonymous with freedom and liberty. Not so now. In Vancouver impresario Bruce Allen, manager of Canadian musicians such as Michael Buble and Bryan Adams, is under attack for what he said in one of his weekly radio editorials. There are calls for him to be fired, for his radio station to be punished and for Allen to be removed from the 2010 Winter Olympics' creative team. "This is all very [full story]
Sep 29, 2007   It appears there is, in fact, no 'continuity of government', meaning

Dear The Expose, It does make "ultimate sense" ....... now, we need hard copy evidence of the correspondence from QE2. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: The Exposé To: John Wilson Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:11 AM Subject: RE: NSW Attorney-General to argue Constitution in Local Court John, RE: "Any of you people sued by The Queen in the Right of Australia? In Canada we are sued by the Attorney General on behalf of the Queen in the Right of Canada. So people have written to the Queen asking her if they owed her any money. Her reply was [full story]
Sep 29, 2007   The right to jury trial means that British citizens, unlike those in foreign dictatorships, are entitled to demand to be tried by '12 good men and true' rather than convicted by an arbitrary tribunal.

Dear Mick, It's simple, isn't it. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mick McFarlane To: John Wilson Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:47 PM Subject: jury 9. TRIAL BY JURYThis principle, like Habeas Corpus, was enshrined in British law by Magna Carta. It survived for eight centuries before coming under venomous attack by modern governments which dislike its inefficiency and expense.The right to jury trial means that British citizens, unlike those in foreign dictatorships, are entitled to demand to be tried by '12 good men and true' [full story]
Sep 27, 2007   Part of Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional Provisions allow search warrants issued without probable cause

The Constitution of the United States is the most sacred document protecting human rights since the Magna Carta. Every U.S. congressman and senator who voted for the Patriot Act violated the oath they took to defend the Constitution of the United States when they assumed office. The U.S. president violated his oath of office by failing to veto the bill as being unconstitutional. Not a whimper from the media! MSNBC.com Part of Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional Provisions allow search warrants issued without probable cause, she says The Associated Press Updated: 5:40 a.m. PT Sept [full story]
Sep 27, 2007   Magna Carta 2007 - an updated version to protect us from an overweening State

Magna Carta 2007 - an updated version to protect us from an overweening StateBy PETER OBORNE - More by this author » Last updated at 01:04am on 27th September 2007 Comments (29) One of the very few surviving copies of the Magna Carta - the famous document that is the foundation of British liberty - has come up for sale in New York. Experts say this copy of the charter will sell for as much as £6million. But the protections written out in the Magna Carta back in 1215 are priceless and never in our history have they come under such sustained and ruthless attack as during the ten years of this Labour [full story]
Sep 26, 2007   You go by Petition for Writ of Mandamus, for the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to do their duty.

Dear Michael, Good one. We'll give them 2 weeks. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Kearns To: John Wilson Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:40 PM Subject: Re: Indictment of Judge in the NSW Court of Appeal. John: You can go to the High Court of Australia.You go by Petition for Writ of Mandamus, for the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to do their duty.The delay, delay, delay, is beyond reasonable and prudent, and in the interest of justice, you demand the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to act, [full story]
Sep 25, 2007   Never before in history have ordinary People had access to the Internet to impose their Will on an unprecedented scale,

Dear P.M., Never before in history have ordinary People had access to the Internet to impose their Will on an unprecedented scale, ie: to make a reality of "Democracy is the Rule of Common Law". As Common Law is made by Juries, then Trial by Jury is the embodiment of Democracy. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. www.rightsandwrong.com.au [full story]
Sep 25, 2007   The artificial dividing of law into

Dear Michael, A step in the right direction - but Juries judge law and fact in all cases. The artificial dividing of law into "civil", "criminal", "equity", "admiralty", etc., with the intention of excluding or putting restrictions on Juries, is immoral and, therefore, unlawful. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. [full story]
Sep 24, 2007   DEMOCRACY or TOTALITARIANISM

DEMOCRACY or TOTALITARIANISM: TOTALITARIANISM. “In a totalitarian state, the goal is to serve the needs of an expanding industrial order and the complexities of bureaucratic government” (Science News Letter). “The extension of government control to all major aspects of social life, typically in the forceful pursuit of a single, overriding objective, and without regard for individual rights or the rule of law” (Encyc. Btir.) The “overriding objective” being to establish a “ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT”, controlled by the INTERNATIONAL BANKS, sovereign over all the PEOPLE of the World. The International [full story]
Sep 23, 2007   “No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land”

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IS FRAUD: FRAUDULENT LOAN CONTRACTS: Under COMMON LAW, there are 8 essential elements for the creation of a contract, ie: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) sufficient consideration; (4) intention to enter legal relations; (5) capacity to contract; (6) legality of purpose; (7) genuine consent; and (8) certainty of terms. VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for uncertainty. To make out that an illegal contract is valid is fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing. FRAUDULENT DEFAULT JUDGMENTS: “No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the [full story]
Sep 22, 2007   Liberty Quotes September 21st 2007

"With every civil right there has to bea corresponding civil obligation."-- Edison Haines quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Edison.Haines.Quote.95B3"When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet."-- Lyle Myhr quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Lyle.Myhr.Quote.4FA2 [full story]
Sep 21, 2007   It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”.

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION OR THE RULES OF THE GAME It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William [full story]
Sep 20, 2007   Democracy is the Rule of Common Law. Bureaucracy is the Rule of Statute Law.

GOING TO COURT: “Where’s the Jury? I have the Democratic Right to Trial by Jury. It takes the congregation of 12 of my equals to form an Executive of Common Law to judge me. You are only a Public Servant, a creation of Bureaucracy, with no Jurisdiction over me, at all. I do not consent for the whole or any part of this action to be hear and tried without a Jury - therefore, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.” **************** Democracy is the Rule of Common Law. Bureaucracy is the Rule of Statute Law. Common [full story]
Sep 16, 2007   which only proves that Trial by Jury is a threat to the anti-democratic heirarchy of those Member States.

Dear chas x, The Geneva Human Rights Commission endorsed it but the New York Assembly of Member States' representatives rejected it...which only proves that Trial by Jury is a threat to the anti-democratic heirarchy of those Member States. My case only proves that, if ordinary People want Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy, they're going to have to overthrow the evil Elites of the world. Did you get that top-notch video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dHHmpUndfE ? Yours sincerely, John Wilson. www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/un.html [full story]
Sep 9, 2007   COMMON LAW is the LAW of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE and for the PEOPLE.

Dear Peter, I just sent out the email below..but it had a few typo mistakes. I hope you and a few of your FREEDOM FORCE can attend tomorrow night. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ----- Original Message ----- From: John Wilson To: > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:12 AM Subject: DEMOCRACY: LIFE or DEATH Dear Fellow Australians, DEMOCRACY is the RULE OF COMMON LAW. COMMON LAW is the LAW of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE and for the PEOPLE. COMMON LAW is made by congregations of 12 FREEMEN as JURORS who ask "SO HELP ME GOD" for them to administer JUSTICE. However, [full story]
Aug 24, 2007   the fate of the world depends on the future of the families in all countries on all continents.

We Are Different, but TogetherWe Are Family That Believes In Family “Certain truths are self evident …nature does not lie. Great nations cannot wish reality away or they will soon become the great nations of yesterday.” Dr. Margaret A. Ogola, Kenya, pediatrician and director for Medical Affairs, Cottolengo Home for Children Living with AIDS Dear Friends of the Family, As a citizen of the great nation of Canada, the statement above has stuck with me since attending the World Congress of Families IV (WCF IV) in Warsaw, Poland last spring. Poland stands tall in Europe as a great nation and as [full story]
Aug 19, 2007   Judges Don't like for jurors to know what power they possess - but when the jury is in the box you must remind the Judge of what the law says.

Dear John: In 1995 I won multiple felony cases against me with a fully informed jury and working as my own attorney. You can go research that at the Panama City News Herald archives if you want. The jurors handbook is a must for any legal case decided by a jury. Many call jury actions - the jury nullification law - juries can decide the facts and interpret the law - they can also declare a law void and unconstitutional - in the case under review. Judges Are Forced to Agree - Just make sure you do it in front of the Jury. Judges Don't like for jurors to know what power they possess - but when [full story]
Jul 18, 2007   Freedom of Speech and Press At Risk

NEWS RELEASE Freedom of Speech and Press At Risk July 17, 2007 For Immediate Release Calgary: Canada Family Action Coalition is calling on the Premier of Alberta to stop the misguided actions against freedom of speech in the media's letter to editor section of papers. Referring to the Boissoin case, Executive Director of CFAC, Brian Rushfeldt said, "The ultimate of freedom of press and speech is seen in the letters to editor section. Does the Alberta Human Rights Commission and one homosexual activist now feel they may exercise their free speech to stop citizens’ letters to newspapers? [full story]
May 26, 2007   Our Rights to a Jury Trial and related websites.......

TRIAL BY JURY is the means of defeating the evil BANKS by, firstly, defeating their protectors, the evil JUDGES. TRIAL BY JURY can then go on to tackle a multitude of WRONGS, which include the issues you raise...a cause for which TRIAL BY JURY has always intended, with 12 Jurors asking GOD to "SO HELP". [full story]
May 26, 2007   [Campaign] Fiona Caroline Cristian vs Perpetual Limited - Court ofAppeal 40839/06 - Common Law Court 13403/06

Comprising a study of rule making powers and procedures, abuse of process and openness in rule making, we have now released the first stage in three, the tools of awakening the public. [full story]
May 15, 2007   Repossessions, Foreclosures in the USA

Yes PRE-TRIAL is a sinister practice, ie: the removal of access to a JURY unless a JUDGE chooses to allow it. [full story]
May 2, 2007   To John Wilson. Common Law versus referenda. From Kenn d'Oudney.

The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys, doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges (U.S. & U.K.). [full story]
May 2, 2007   Newspaper editorial on 'attacks on freedom'

(while I agree with the thrust of the article, I have little sympathy for the journalists here because they have for too long protected the two-party system and persecuted political independents like Pauline Hanson and others, failed to stand up the common law system, promoted socialist, politically-correct ideologies and of late turned large sections of their editorial space over to trash and trivia. The tabloid media has also constantly demanded police state-style laws to control social problems like drugs and ‘hooning’ while giving uncritical support to the so-called war on terror and other [full story]
May 2, 2007   The Thought Police

In George Orwell’s classic novel 1984, the government Thought Police constantly spies on citizens to make sure they are not thinking rebellious thoughts. Thought crimes are severely punished by Big Brother. 1984 was intended as a warning against totalitarian governments that enslave and control their citizens. Never have we needed this warning more urgently than now, because America’s Thought Police are knocking on your door. [full story]
Mar 29, 2007   Brian Wilshire

In a Democracy, the People Rule .....and they do this through Trial by Jury. Juries make and impose Common Law. Common Law overrules Statute Law, because Statute Law is inferior to Common Law by virtue of the fact that People are superior to Parliament and any other entity of Bureaucracy. [full story]
Mar 5, 2007   Top notch legal advice and it is free..................

ATTORNEY'S ADVICE -- NO CHARGE Read this and make a copy for your files in case you need to refer to it someday. Maybe we should all take some of his advice. A corporate attorney sent the following out to the employees in his company. [full story]
Dec 12, 2004   Protecting your Rights by Signing Documents

Protecting your Rights by Signing Documents "WITHOUT PREJUDICE"by Lynne Meredith It is a maxim of American law that any statute contrary to the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, is null and void and no Citizen is bound to obey an unconstitutional law. "An unconstitutional statute, though having the form of law, is in reality, no law and imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power on anyone and justifies no actions performed under it..." (late Am Jur 2d Sec. 256). It is also a maxim of the Common Law that no Sovereign American Citizen of the 50 Republic [full story]
Nov 13, 2004   Jefferson on Politics & Government The Bill of Rights

Jefferson on Politics & Government The Bill of Rights15. The Bill of Rights When our Constitution was first established, it was assumed that the description of specific powers granted to the government would leave no doubt as to what the government could and could not do, and that the absence of powers over the rights of the people would leave those rights protected. But Jefferson and others were wary of leaving such important matters up to inference. They insisted on a Bill of Rights that would state in unmistakable terms those rights of the people that must be left inviolate. Click here [full story]
Oct 16, 2003   The Battle for the University Bill of Rights

SEE: “Constitution & Charter of Rights” under “Issues Research” By David Horowitz FrontPageMagazine.com I spent the beginning of October visiting universities in the state of Colorado, where I had gone to promote the Academic Bill of Rights. This is a document designed to take politics out of the university curriculum and to protect the right of students to get an education rather than an indoctrination. In practice, this meant that I was throwing down the gauntlet to the tenured leftists who have colonized the faculties of American colleges and turned American campuses into their political [full story]
Oct 8, 2003   Rule of law is fundamental to the governance of a state; consequently, it is regarded as a symbol of sovereignty.

SEE: “NWO Court, (ICC), Justice, & Law & Order” under “Issues Research” By Paul Janiczek Helen of Sparta left for Troy of her own accord. By divine behest, Paris the Trojan took her hand after being promised it by Aphrodite, the busybody of Greek mythology. In their wake, they left Helen's numerous broken-hearted suitors. It was a stupid move on the part of Paris to pick a fight with so many would-be beaus in one stroke. A great war ensued. This episode of mythology is meant to explain the origin of the costliest war of Greek antiquity save the Peloponnesian War. Through ancient fiction, [full story]